Tuesday, January 27, 2015

The Impact of the Khazars, Venetian Bloodlines, the Creation of Pakistan, and Deconstructing Christianity


     "At the time of the Arab-Khazar wars, at least up to the second decade of the 8th century.  Though it was probably not the original intention of the Khazars, in many cases their actions had the consequence, that the Byzantines were able to take advantage of the situation, and reclaim lands from the temporarily weakened Arabs. Additionally, in 732/3 Constantine V married the daughter of the Khagan, their union resulting in the birth of Leo IV “The Khazar”. It was to the interest of the Umayyad Caliphate to weaken the position of the Byzantine Empire in the western part of the Caucasus, merely by reducing the power of the Khazars, who were not exactly allies, but at least not enemies of the Byzantine state. After the first Arab-Khazar war in 654, the underlying cause of most clashes was the desire for plunder, as retaliation for other raids, or in the anticipation of easy spoils. The background of more powerful attacks may have involved significant strategic plans, though the sources and the chain of events do not allow a conclusive judgment. Even if such long-term plans existed, none of them were fulfilled, even partially. Sources indicate that both parties intended to bring the Caucasian states under their control in the intervals between major clashes, particularly between the first and second Arab-Khazar wars. They both wished to appoint a leader to the states who would be loyal to them. There were two main reasons for this: the states would provide troops and levy to the particular empire, or rather to the governor of the region, and they would serve as a buffer in the event of an attack.  Although the Khazar Khaganate provided military help to the Byzantine Empire, there are no details as to any Byzantine military help in return in the one and a half decades of the Arab-Khazar wars. Justinianus II married the daughter or sister of the Khazar Khagan in 700, and Constantine married a Khazar princess in 723. However, there was no cooperation between the empires in fending off the Arab attacks.  Most importantly, a crucial driving force behind the early Muslim conquests (besides the desire for booty and land), the religious elements, should not be forgotten. The religious background was still firmly present in the life of the state after the Umayyads, who partially represented the Arab aristocracy, came into power in 661, though the importance of religion did not suffer more than a slight decrease. The dynasty certainly acted on and fought in the name of Islam, but the general cause was obviously not to spread Islam, but often the undeclared taking of spoils. By the time of the assumption of power by the Abbasids, who seemingly put Islam forward at the level of propaganda, partly because of the consequences of the dynasty change, the conquering Arab waves had virtually come to an end, as had the Arab-Khazar wars. To summarize, the aim of rapid Arab expansion was probably the driving force only in the attack in 654, and the possibility of double crossing the Byzantine Empire emerged out only by chance. By the time of the upswing of the battles in the 8th century, the waves of the Arab conquests had been completed.  In addition, the only occasions on which huge armies could be regrouped at the borderline in the Caucasus were between the battles against the Byzantine Empire. By this time, Muslim power had been established in the south Caucasus, and the importance of the mountain chain as a line of defense had been realized, more experience had been acquired with nomadic peoples in Central Asia, and the steppe had proved to be almost defenseless for settled peoples. By the 8th century, many trade routes, including a long section of the Silk Route, had been brought under Muslim control. Consequently, this could not have been a predominant factor in the Arab-Khazar wars, with the exception of the initial period of the wars. The fights were mainly induced by the presence of the Khazar Khaganate in the northern Caucasus, and the aim of the Muslim attack in 737 was victory and suppression, but a similar aim can not be demonstrated as regards the Eastern European steppe. This could be an indication of the unique, but rather powerless attempt of the Muslims to increase their domination in the Khazar area after the wars. A substantial Muslim army should have been stationed at Khazaria in order to build up domination in the area, but the Umayyad Caliphate’s main armies were concentrated elsewhere in Europe and Central Asia, and sufficient military and financial aid was stretched. The Khazars maintained their boundaries against repeated Arab attacks, and in doing so Islam could have probably appeared much more preponderantly on the East-European steppe. But this not means that the Khazars “saved” Eastern Europe from the Arab conquest. By the start of the 11th century, Khazaria had ceased to exist and many Khazarians were dispersed through Byzantine, Venetian territories, and Western Europe".


        "There had been a long trading relationship between the Venetians and the Byzantines before, starting with the Byzantine-Venetian Treaty of 1082. However, with the chaotic events of 1204, the relationship between the two powers had greatly changed. Following the Sack of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade in 1204, the Venetians, who had played a crucial role in the Crusade's diversion and the eventual sack of the Byzantine capital, stood preeminent amongst the victors. In the subsequent arrangement between the Crusaders, the "Partitio Terrarum Imperii Romaniae", the Venetians were to receive three-eighths of the Byzantine Empire, including three-eighths of Constantinople itself.  Since Venice did receive the greatest benefit from the Crusade, they claimed the islands in the Aegean Sea, most importantly Crete, and a chain of ports and coastal forts along the Greek shores, thus coming to dominate the trade centers and routes all across the former Byzantine Empire. With Venetian support, the Latins continued their campaign into the Balkans to assert their control over former Byzantine lands, but were halted at the Battle of Adrianople in 1205 by the Bulgarians. The newly established Latin Empire, together with Venice, signed a secret treaty with Ghiyaseddin Kay-Khusraw I, the Turkish Sultan of Rum for a joint war against the chief Byzantine Greek successor state, the Empire of Nicaea. In response, Nicaean emperor Theodore Lascaris made contact with King Leo I of Lesser Armenia in Cilicia who was also threatened by the Sultanate. The agreement between the two realms was concluded by the marriage of Philippa of Armenia, niece of Leo to Lascaris as his second wife in 1214. The treaty gave the newly established Nicaean Empire sufficient breathing space to consolidate and later expand its territory at the expense of the Latin Empire, while Venice gained access to markets that had not been open to them before, including recognition of their presence in Constantinople. During the early 1270s, Pope Gregory X ordered the Venetians not to renew the treaty until the union between the Greek Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches was complete, thus permanently invalidating the treaty".  


     "The "Black Nobility" are/were the oligarchic families of Venice and Genoa, Italy, who in the 12th century held the privileged trading rights (monopolies). The first of three crusades, from 1063 to 1123, established the power of the Venetian Black Nobility and solidified the power of the wealthy ruling class. The Black Nobility aristocracy achieved complete control over Venice in 1171, when the appointment of the Doge was transferred to what was known as the Great Council, which consisted of members of the commercial aristocracy (among them the infamous de’Medici family). Venice has remained in their hands ever since, but the power and influence of the Venetian Black Nobility extends far beyond its borders, and today it is felt in every corner of the globe. In 1204 the oligarchic family parceled out feudal enclaves to their members, and from this epoch dates the great building-up of power and pressure until the government became a closed corporation of the leading Black Nobility families.  The Black Nobility earned its title through dirty tricks, so when the population revolted against the monopolies in government, as anywhere else, the leaders of the uprising were quickly seized and brutally hanged. The Black Nobility uses secret assassinations, murder, blackmail, the bankrupting of opposing citizens or companies, kidnapping, rape and so on.
Who are these families today?
  • House of Bernadotte, Sweden
  • House of Bourbon, France
  • House of Braganza, Portugal
  • House of Grimaldi, Monaco
  • House of Guelph (Welf), Britain (the most important one)
  • House of Habsburg, Austria
  • House of Hanover, Germany (the second most important one)
  • House of Hohenzollern, Germany
  • House of Karadjordjevic, Yugoslavia (former)
  • House of Liechtenstein, Liechtenstein
  • House of Nassau, Luxembourg
  • House of Oldenburg, Denmark
  • House of Orange, Netherlands
  • House of Savoy, Italy
  • House of Wettin, Belgium
  • House of Wittelsbach, Germany
  • House of Württemberg, Germany
  • House of Zogu, Albania
  • all the families you will find on the Windsor family tree
     All the families listed are connected with the House of Guelph (also known as "Welf"), one of the original Black Nobility families of Venice, from which the House of Windsor and thus the present Queen of England, Elizabeth II, descends. The Guelphs are so intertwined with the German aristocracy through the House of Hanover that it would take several pages to mention all their connections. Almost all European royal houses originate from the House of Hanover and thus from the House of Guelph — the Black Nobility. The Black Nobility are the founders of the secret society of our day from which all the others that are connected to the "Illuminati" originated from — the Committee of 300. The Club of Rome, the C.F.R., the R.I.I.A., the Bilderbergers, the Round Table all originate from the Committee of 300 and therefore from the European Black Nobility families. Co-operating with the European Black Nobility are American families like the Harrimans, the McGeorge Bundy, the Bush. The House of Hanover seems to be German, but is Jewish. So is the House of Habsburg.  So it wasn't really the Germans who took over the British throne".

Sir Muhammad Iqbal, (widely known as Allama Iqbal), Muhammad Ali Jinnah, and the creation of Pakistan
    "Few know presently that it was the British who thought up the idea of a Muslim state in India (in order to continue their Divide and Rule strategy).  In fact, in 1922, Muhammad Iqbal was knighted by King George V, giving him the title "Sir". While studying law and philosophy in Englandhe would be tutored and brainwashed for three years. While in EnglandRothschild made sure that he was inducted into the executive committee of the Muslim League's  British chapter in 1908 becoming a member of the London branch of the All India Muslim League where he was instrumental in drafting  the constitution of Muslim League.  Later, in one of his most famous speeches, Iqbal pushed for the creation of a Muslim state in Northwest India. This took place in his presidential speech in the League's December 1930 session.  Building a strong, personal correspondence with Jinnah, Iqbal was an influential force in convincing Jinnah to end his self-imposed exile in London, return to India and take charge of the League. Iqbal firmly believed that Jinnah was the only leader capable of drawing Indian Muslims to the League and maintaining party unity before the British and the CongressWhile Iqbal espoused the idea of Muslim-majority provinces in 1930, Jinnah would continue to hold talks with the Congress through the decade and only officially embraced the goal of Pakistan in 1940. Many historians postulate that Jinnah always remained hopeful for an agreement with the Congress and never fully desired the partition of India. Iqbal's close correspondence with Jinnah is speculated by some historians as having been responsible for Jinnah's embrace of the idea of Pakistan. Iqbal elucidated to Jinnah his vision of a separate Muslim state in a letter sent on 21 June 1937: "A separate federation of Muslim Provinces, reformed on the lines I have suggested above, is the only course by which we can secure a peaceful India and save Muslims from the domination of Non-Muslims. Why should not the Muslims of North-West India and Bengal be considered as nations entitled to self-determination just as other nations in India and outside India are".  Iqbal, serving as president of the Punjab Muslim League, criticised Jinnah's political actions, including a political agreement with Punjabi leader Sir Sikander Hyat Khan, whom Iqbal saw as a representative of feudal classes and not committed to Islam as the core political philosophy. Nevertheless, Iqbal worked constantly to encourage Muslim leaders and masses to support Jinnah and the League. Speaking about the political future of Muslims in India, Iqbal said: "There is only one way out. Muslims should strengthen Jinnah's hands. They should join the Muslim League. Indian question, as is now being solved, can be countered by our united front against both the Hindus and the English. Without it, our demands are not going to be accepted. People say our demands smack of communalism. This is sheer propaganda. These demands relate to the defense of our national existence.... The united front can be formed under the leadership of the Muslim League. And the Muslim League can succeed only on account of Jinnah. Now none but Jinnah is capable of leading the Muslims".  Without Sir Muhammad Iqbal, the idea of Pakistan is not born, India would have remained one.  Without the West's support of Pakistan since the Cold War, Pakistan and India would have went in different directions.  Now India, Pakistan, the West, and the East are only headed into conflict.
     Ever since the Cold War, the West has been supporting Conservative Islam against Pan Arabism and Secular Arabism.  The West (especially Britain and the U.S.A.)  have been dragging this agenda of "holy war" which is playing out today.  However, without the support of the West since the Cold War, Conservative Islam would never have revived itself after Colonization.  Modern Muslim identity was not shaped in modern history until the creation of Pakistan by Jinnah.  This is why you see the West supporting the Taliban, Pakistan, and Syrian fighters (ISIS).  The West has always used Muslims and Conservative Islam as pawns in a global agenda that they have been creating even before World War 1.

     Since all eyes are solely focused on the CIA, MI5 or MI6, Mossad is often overlooked as a force in society that is affecting so much geopolitics regularly.  Mossad's hands have been pushing the "Holy War" since the creation of Israel in order to ensure no other alternative is created.  This is done by ensuring Arabism failed and Liberal Islamic areas have now been overthrown. Since 2003, with the invasion of Iraq by the Americans and the "Arab Uprising" -the only face left to show of Arabs to the masses is that of Conservative Islam and Radical Islam. Both images playing right into Mossad's hands which they are using for complete chaos.


1.) THE LETTER J -“The letter 'J' originated as a swash letter long (/-)i, used for the letter 'i' at the end of Roman numerals when following another 'i', as in 'xxiij' instead of 'xxiii' for the Roman numeral representing 23. A distinctive usage emerged in Middle High German. Gian Giorgio Trissino (1478–1550) was the first to explicitly distinguish 'I' and 'J' as representing separate sounds, in his Ɛpistola del Trissino de le lettere nuωvamente aggiunte ne la lingua italiana ("Trissino's epistle about the letters recently added in the Italian language") of 1524.  Classical Latin did not have a distinct J sound (the J as we know in English.) When "I" was followed by another vowel, it usually sounded similar to English /Y/. Thus we had Iulius which was as if you said /Yulius/ or /Yulyus/.  Before j became differentiated from "i", the "J" sound could be spelled with g in various combinations (edge, gem, exaggerate, etc.); and in ancient times, the names you mentioned were pronounced with an initial "Y" sound. Transcribed from Hebrew, Jesus was "Yeshua". The Romans would have spelled Justinian "Iustinianus."  Due to European Colonization, most people that are familiar with Christianity presently are familiar with the King James version written in 1611.  Iesus, Yeshua, Yeshua ben Yosef, Isa, and Isho were the common names before "Jesus" was used.

2.) CHRISTIAN ZIONISM -is a belief among some Christians that the return of the Jews to the Holy Land, and the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, is in accordance with Biblical prophecy. The term Christian Zionism began to be used in the mid-20th century, superseding Christian Restorationism. Traditional Catholic thought however did not consider Zionism in any form. Christian advocacy of the restoration of the Jews arose following the Protestant Reformation. Some Christian Zionists believe that the "ingathering" of Jews in Israel is a prerequisite for the Second Coming of Jesus. This belief is primarily, though not exclusively, associated with Christian Dispensationalism. The idea that Christians should actively support a Jewish return to the Land of Israel, along with the parallel idea that the Jews ought to be encouraged to become Christian, as a means of fulfilling a Biblical prophecy has been common in Protestant circles since the Reformation. Many Christian Zionists believe that the people of Israel remain part of the chosen people of God, along with the "ingrafted" Gentile Christians.
'Lord Shaftesbury's "Memorandum to Protestant Monarchs of Europe for the restoration of the Jews to Palestine", published in the Colonial Times, in 1841

The version of Christianity that existed before Constantine had the First Council of Nicea and made Christianity the state religion
link to the Gnostic texts http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhlalpha.html
link to Gnostic Christianity video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gzvs2Fex6ms (44:44 mins.)
link to Zeitigsist video  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MzcC-uc_fM  (27:53 mins.)

4.) THE FIRST COUNCIL OF NICEA  -was a council of Christian bishops convened in Nicaea in Bithynia by the Roman Emperor Constantine I in AD 325 and presided by Hosius of Cordova (a bishop from the West and probably a Papal delegate). This first ecumenical council was the first effort to attain consensus in the church through an assembly representing all of Christendom.  Previously, there were many versions, beliefs, views, and texts of Christianity.  Its main accomplishments were settlement of the Christological issue of the nature of the Son of God and his relationship to God the Father, the construction of the first part of the Creed of Nicaea, establishing uniform observance of the date of Easter, and promulgation of early canon law. Christianity was illegal in the empire until the emperors Constantine and Licinius agreed in 313 to what became known as the Edict of Milan. However, Nicene Christianity did not become the state religion of the Roman Empire until the Edict of Thessalonica in 380. In the mean time, paganism remained legal and present in public affairs. In 321 (four years before Nicaea), Constantine declared Sunday to be an Empire wide day of rest in honor of the sun. At the time of the council, imperial coinage and other imperial motifs still depicted pagan cult symbology in combination with the Emperor's image. Constantine's role regarding Nicaea was that of supreme civil leader and authority in the empire. As Emperor, the responsibility for maintaining civil order was his, and he sought that the Church be of one mind and at peace. When first informed of the unrest in Alexandria due to the Arian disputes, he was "greatly troubled" and, "rebuked" both Arius and Bishop Alexander for originating the disturbance and allowing it to become public. Aware also of "the diversity of opinion" regarding the celebration of Easter and hoping to settle both issues, he sent the "honored" Bishop Hosius of Cordova (Hispania) to form a local church council and "reconcile those who were divided". When that embassy failed, he turned to summoning a synod at Nicaea, inviting "the most eminent men of the churches in every country". Constantine assisted in assembling the council by arranging that travel expenses to and from the bishops' episcopal sees, as well as lodging at Nicaea, be covered out of public funds. He also provided and furnished a "great hall ... in the palace" as a place for discussion so that the attendees "should be treated with becoming dignity". In addressing the opening of the council, he "exhorted the Bishops to unanimity and concord" and called on them to follow the Holy Scriptures with: "Let, then, all contentious disputation be discarded; and let us seek in the divinely-inspired word the solution of the questions at issue." Thereupon, the debate about Arius and church doctrine began. "The emperor gave patient attention to the speeches of both parties" and "deferred" to the decision of the bishops. The bishops first pronounced Arius' teachings to be anathema, formulating the creed as a statement of correct doctrine. When Arius and two followers refused to agree, the bishops pronounced clerical judgement by excommunicating them from the Church. Respecting the clerical decision, and seeing the threat of continued unrest, Constantine also pronounced civil judgement, banishing them into exile.  Constantine in fact subdued all enemies he seen as attacking his vision of the state religion he was creating.  This is how the Christianity that you know presently was formed.  Not because of the man on the cross but because of the man on the emperor's chair and his footsoldiers.

4.) THE MYTH OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE's COLLAPSE.  -In fact, the Roman Empire consolidated and grew under Emperor Constantine.  When Emperor Constantine moved his power base to the East (which later became known as the Byzantine Empire), the West became ruled over by first the Church until it was ruled over by Emperor Charlemagne (the Holy Roman Emperor in the West).  Even today, the Roman Empire has not collapsed. It's influence politically, economically, and militarily is far ranging.  Blood lines, Royal lineages, and Institutes still keep the Roman Empire alive and influential presently.

5.) THE SILLY ARGUMENT OF "JESUS WAS JEWISH AND THEREFORE WE NOW NEED TO SUPPORT THE JEWS IN ISRAEL AND THE ZIONISTS" -In fact, Jesus had conflicts with the Sadducees and Pharisees who were also Jewish.  During the time of Christ and the New Testament era, the Sadducees were aristocrats. They tended to be wealthy and held powerful positions, including that of chief priests and high priest, and they held the majority of the 70 seats of the ruling council called the Sanhedrin. The Pharisees were mostly middle-class businessmen, and therefore were in contact with the common man. The Pharisees were held in much higher esteem by the common man than the Sadducees. Though they were a minority in the Sanhedrin and held a minority number of positions as priests, they seemed to control the decision making of the Sanhedrin far more than the Sadducees did, again because they had the support of the people. Jesus did not agree with the state 'nor the Jewish leaders of the time.  So you don't have to support Zionists or the state of Israel if you are Christian.  You don't have to give up Christianity just because you don't support Zionism or the state of Israel either.  

6.) THE SILLY ARGUMENT OF "WHAT WOULD JESUS DO TODAY?" -Jesus conflicted with money lenders and money changers in the temple. Christians think this is the only account of Jesus using physical force in any of the Gospels. The narrative occurs near the end of the Synoptic Gospels (at Mark 11: 15-19, 11: 27-33; Matthew 21: 12-17, 21: 23-17 & Luke 19: 45-48, 20:1-8) and near the start in the Gospel of John (at John 2: 13-16). Some scholars believe that these refer to two separate incidents, given that the Gospel of John also includes more than one Passover.                                

7.) "Two hands working together have done more to this world than two hands clasped in prayer"
- Vibrations caused by prayers and thoughts can only radiate energy outwards and pull energy inwards but they cannot alter physical reality.  If one believes in physical Jesus, one must also realize the physical flesh is constrained and can only endure so much before it perishes. Realize we all have 24 hours a day and there is no excuse for just hoping and praying for something to change.  Either we force the change or we force our thoughts to change, but just praying doesn't bring change about, no matter how hard or long you pray.

8.) Whether you choose to believe in Jesus or not (or in a particular version of Jesus) -Realize that there is a lot to be thankful for.  Understand and accept that there is much done for you by people you will never see or touch.  We are all complicit in what goes on in the world, whether we see it, understand it, accept it, or ignore it.  "Birth lottery" first and foremost affects our lives more than anything else.

     The chart below was copied from 'The Jewish Virtual Library ", which pulled the information from the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Notice where the seven "annihilation camps" (in red) are said to have been located: 

Forced Labor


Holding Center

Forced Labor


Forced Labor

Forced Labor

Forced Labor

Forced Labor

Forced Labor

Forced Labor


Forced Labor

Forced Labor

Forced Labor

Holding Center

Forced Labor

Forced Labor

Forced Labor


Forced Labor

Czech Republic
Holding Center/Transit



       Six of the "annihilation camps" were based in Poland, one in Ukraine, zero in either Germany, France or the Netherlands. That's a very weird "anomaly". Why the east-west divide between "work" and "extermination"? If you know anything at all about World War II and the subsequent birth of "The Iron Curtain", you know that no western researchers, no aid workers, no religious groups, no Red Cross volunteers, no human rights activists, no investigative researchers and no do-gooders of any stripe ever got a chance to poke around in Joe Stalin's Communist post-war front yard of Poland or Ukraine. Hence, all those that need the annihilation camps, both then and now, can make any claim they want to in regard to what took place in the air-tight closed east. In 1945, it was essential to keep the "annihilation camps" mainly in Stalin's Poland & Ukraine. Seventy years later, it is essential to keep the "annihilation camps" completely in Poland & Ukraine

     The original claim of the gas chambers of Auschwitz was made in May of 1945 by Joseph Stalin's Jewish dominated "Extraordinary State Commission", AFTER Germany's unconditional surrender. AGAIN, with neither investigation nor confirmation, Stalin's 'gas chambers' claim was publicized in the Jewish owned New York Times; the most "prestigious" newspaper in the world.
MAY 8, 1945

Page 12, Column 5



Soviet Commission Reports Death Camp in Poland Was Founded by Himmler

By C. L. Sulzberger
By Wireless to The New York Times

Moscow, May 7 - More than 4,000,000 persons were systematically slaughtered in a single German concentration camp - that at Oswiecim in Poland, near Cracow from 1939 - 1944. The Germans thus accomplished with scientific efficiency the greatest incidence of mass murder in recorded history.
     This slaughter exceeds in barbaric intention and method not only the greatest brutalities of such infamous conquerers as Genghis Khan but also surpasses even Germany's own record in previous prize exhibitions  at Maldenak, Dachau and Buchenwald.
     Such is the miserable tale made public today - on the eve of the official end of the European War - by the Soviet Union's Extraordinary State Commission investigating the extermination center at Oswiecim.....these are the first statistical data of the camp's record.
      According to the Soviet Commission, "more than 4,000,000 citizens of the Soviet Union, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and other countries.....were exterminated at Oswiecim. The methods used were "shooting, famine, poisoning and monstrous tortures."
      The report states that gas chambers, crematoria, surgical wards, laboratories and clinics were erected around Oswiecim to accomplish this mass production monstrosity.
 .....Public baths were installed for group cyanide poisoning
 ....The report states that in 1943 the frugal Germans decided to sell the unburned bones to the firm of Schterheim....in addition to the 113 tons of crushed bones, loads of women's hair were sold for industrial purposes.
 .....human guinea pigs were kept alive for experimentation.
NY Times, May 8, 1945, (above) p.12, Column 5, carries SOVIET claim of "gas chambers" at Auschwitz.

     Most people(s) want to forget that the atrocities that were committed on them, Jews don't because they still have so much to gain and legitimize because of the atrocities.  The Jews need Hitler and the Germans more than anyone else does.  In fact, nothing is ever mentioned about:
(a) the Land Lease Deal in 1941 given to the USSR and Stalin by the U.S.A. and Britain which kept the USSR in the war and enabled them to stave off defeat to Hitler.
 "Besides weaponry and food, Lend-Lease provided the Soviet Union with other resources, ranging from clothing to metals. With the start of the Cold War, Lend-Lease became a forgotten chapter in Soviet history and was only revived after "Glasnost". Lend-Lease provided vital help for the Soviet Union when the country was in desperate straits and made a significant contribution to the final victory. It also strengthened Josef Stalin, a fact that did not bother its chief architect, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who saw beyond the Allied victory and looked at Stalin as a counterbalance to the European colonial powers"
(b) Appeasing Stalin.  The mainstream media, history documentaries, political rhetoric (even today), and the entertainment sector always place blame on Neville Chamberlain for appeasing Hitler yet nothing is ever mentioned about the fact that though World War 2 broke out because Hitler invaded Poland, the West was contractually obligated to defend Poland from any attacking power (which also meant the USSR who also invaded Poland simultaneously). The West appeased Stalin and the Soviets -to the shock of the Polish - as it did throughout the War when his demands were made to them.

(c) Hitler never refers to his National Socialists as "Nazis".  Only the Jewish media in the West did.  It is amusing how we only know of Hitler and the Germans (even to this day) through the language of those that hated them and wanted them destroyed in order to have a justification in creating the state of Israel.

(d) The sole reason for Hitler's expansion was creating a Greater Germany which included re-absorbing Austria and Danzig (in Poland).  However, Hitler's rise to power came about because of the Versailles Treaty after World War 1 which humiliated  Germany and gave away much of their territory to Poland and France.  More so, even World War 1 could have been avoided had it not been for the British and French during the Crimean War (1853-1856) and the Russo-Turkish War (1877-78).  Without Britain and France's interference, the Ottoman Empire would have been destroyed and independence movements of Serbia and Bulgaria would have been avoided

      The non-distracted will always seem ridiculous to those who fill their lives with distractions of other people's thoughts while living in a fast paced world.  Distractions enable the intellectual mind to cocoon itself around justifications that it needs to believe in, in order to believe a particular narrative and ideology in play.  In fact, adults need illusions to justify their whole lives and actions whereas children can have their illusions disappear in front of them and then start all over again without missing a step.  Adults though have built a belief system around the distractions in order to believe in their illusions and justify their lives and choices hence making it harder to give up their illusions.  Therefore adults need their illusions more than children do.  Sadly, believing in one narrative, one ideology, or one theory stops you from acting and preventing the next problem that occurs and this is what is happening presently in politics.  Not re-opening and re-examining the past is allowing for particular problems to be unavoidable.  Believing in the Holocaust with 6 million Jewish dead and therefore legitimizing the state of Israel (and protecting it at all costs) is allowing for geopolitical tensions to continue to build in the Middle East.  It is illogical to believe in the institutional narrative, the entertainment narrative, and the mainstream media's narrative of the Holocaust even though it has been proven countless times that Countries and Institutions manipulate data regularly such as: GDP and job Data (http://www.cnbc.com/id/101210063) and Global Warming data (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/10916086/The-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html).  Not understanding the Khazar's influence on Byzantine, Central Asia, and the West has allowed us to walk a dangerous path that we must all be accountable for.  Ignorance is a choice and for many it is a choice that they do not want to alter because truth makes one complicit in the crimes of humanity and against humanity.  Understanding that Khazars are not Semites will enable one to understand that historically (as well as present day) there are different types of Jews that exist.  The stereotypes of all Jews being rich is just that, a stereotype.  There are poor Jews and rich Jews.  Poor Jews are seen as "collateral damage" and deemed as expendable by the Rich Jews.  Many times, poor Jews are innocent Jews caught in a chess game played by Rich Jews.  In fact, Jewish society is not as unified as one is made to believe due to the mainstream media images and movies you see regularly.  Zionists do not care about regular Jews, they care only about bringing their agendas and plans to fruition "by any means necessary".  This is why since the 1800s, the world has been heading into a particular direction that seems unavoidable though it is more of a self fulfilling mandate than anything else.


As difficult as this is for many to believe, they are one and the same. Both are the "morning star", "the bearer of light".  There is no separation of good and bad, but one living reality. The Adepts know this, the masses do not.



No comments:

Post a Comment